In a world where discussions about work-life balance and mental health are more relevant than ever, debates about extended workweeks are sparking heated opinions.
Recently, Larsen and Toubro Chairman SN Subrahmanyan stirred controversy by advocating for a 90-hour workweek, even suggesting employees should forego Sundays. While his comment-“How long can you stare at your wife?”—drew sharp criticism for its insensitivity, it also reignited the ongoing discourse on corporate expectations and employee well-being.
Adding to the conversation, Anand Mahindra, the Chairman of Mahindra Group, offered a balanced yet thought-provoking perspective. Responding to a query about the 90-hour workweek, Mahindra refrained from targeting individuals but subtly challenged the very premise of the argument.
Anand Mahindra gave a top-notch response to 90-hour workweek remark
Mahindra emphasized the importance of focusing on the quality of work rather than the number of hours spent working. “My wife is wonderful; I love staring at her,” Anand Mahindra replied.
“It’s not about 40 hours, it’s not about 70 hours, it’s not about 90 hours. What output are you doing? Even if it’s 10 hours, you can change the world in 10 hours,” he said. This perspective shifts the focus from quantity-driven productivity to outcome-based performance, advocating for smarter, not harder, work.
Mahindra also underlined the importance of leadership in fostering a work culture that prioritizes effective decision-making over endless hours. “I have always believed that you have to have leaders and people in your company who make wise decisions, wise choices,” he remarked. His statement suggests that cultivating a healthy, efficient, and innovative workforce is a more sustainable and impactful approach than demanding excessive hours.
This response comes in the wake of a similar debate sparked by Infosys co-founder Narayana Murthy, who advocated for a 70-hour workweek, arguing it was necessary for India to catch up with global economies. While the intent might be to drive productivity, such suggestions raise concerns about the long-term effects on employee mental health, family life, and overall well-being.
Anand Mahindra’s reply serves as a refreshing counterpoint, highlighting the need for a balanced approach to work that respects both productivity and human well-being.